Step 1: Submission: From all researchers are asked to yield their articles through journal site and researchers ought to carefully submit a subject that adjusts with the scope and focus of this journal. It is essential to review the journal's rules to guarantee compliance. Once the manuscript is prepared, it can be submitted through the journal's online submission system.  Step 2: Editorial Assessment: After the manuscript is submitted, the editor-in-chief or director of the journal performs an initial appraisal. This evaluation includes assessing the manuscript's fit with the journal's scope, generally quality, and adherence to designing rules. If the manuscript meets these criteria, it continues to the following step. In any case, in case the original copy is regarded unacceptable for publication, it may be rejected at this stage, and the researcher will get a notice of rejection. 
Step 3: Peer Review Assignment: If the manuscript passes the initial evaluation, the editor assigns it to reviewers within the field for peer review. The identities of the reviewers are kept anonymous to guarantee fair-mindedness and minimize bias. Reviewers are chosen based on their information, involvement, and their capacity to provide important feedback on the manuscript. 
Step 4: Peer Review During the peer review process, reviewers altogether assess the manuscript's content, technique, creativity, and noteworthiness. They evaluate the strengths and shortcomings of the study, recognize any mistakes or gaps within the investigate, and give helpful criticism to progress the manuscript. Commentators may too recommend corrections, extra tests, or advance investigation if essential. The review process is regularly conducted inside a particular time period, which shifts depending on the journal's policies. 
Step 5: Choice Once the peer review is complete, the commentators submit their reports to the editor. Based on the feedback received, the editor chooses with respect to the manuscript. The decision can drop into a few categories, including: 
I. Acceptance: The manuscript is accepted for publication without any major revisions. 
II. Minor revisions: The manuscript requires minor revisions and changes some time recently last acceptance. 
III. Major revisions: The manuscript requires critical revisions and encourage review before a final decision can be made. 
Rejection: The manuscript isn't appropriate for publication within the journal. 
Step 6: Revision and Re-submission If the manuscript requires modifications, the researcher is informed and given with the reviewers' comments. Researchers ought to carefully address each comment, reexamine the manuscript appropriately, and provide a point by point response to the editor clarifying the changes made. The reexamined manuscript, beside the response letter, is then resubmitted to the journal.

Step 7: Final Decision and Publication Upon receiving the reexamined manuscript, the editor re-evaluates it along side the responses and corrections. Depending on the extent of revisions, the manuscript may be sent back to the reviewers for further assessment. The final decision is made by the editor, considering the reviewers' suggestions and the changed manuscript. If accepted, the manuscript goes through the publication process, including copyediting,typesetting, and editing, before it is formally published within the journal.